The goal of Michael’s talk is to make us better communicators. One of the things he shares is that actors play roles from the head, heart or groin. As leaders, we must do the same. When we work from our head, we’re being logical, pragmatic. Working from our heart means using emotion. Groin is where we go when we must have a “fierce” conversation, when we must be tough. As a coach, I’d say most of us don’t do groin very well.
I noted above that most of us don’t do groin very well; when a response from the groin is appropriate, we tend to sugar coat it and do a poor job of communicating what we intended. Or, we respond emotionally by losing our temper. Responding aggressively is not the same as responding assertively. An emotionally intelligent, assertive response means being able to express our feelings, take stands on issues, and disagree without projecting aggression. It’s difficult for most of use to do this, but necessary if we’re to become better leaders.
How do we apply these three roles to our work? The existential psychologist Rollo May said, “True freedom lies in the ability to pause between stimulus and response and in that pause, choose.” Each of us has an opportunity to pause and choose the role that best fits a situation. We can choose to respond from the head, the heart or the groin.
When I’m coaching and people ask me about a course of action they intend to take, I ask two questions. First, I ask, “Will this action get you the results you want?” And second, I ask, “At what cost?”
These are two of the best questions a leader can ask himself or herself. They apply to the roles we play as well as the decisions we make.